Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on prohibited sports betting.

No, they weren’t personally in participation, but the world-famous stars were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos – the controversial sites providing both free casino-style video games and financially rewarding rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can ‘play for complimentary,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to point out suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t subject to regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits in 2015 alone. Now the company deals with allegations of prohibited sports betting in a New York suit that claims VGW uses celeb endorsers to ‘create a veneer of authenticity’ around its item. (See VGW’s declaration listed below)

‘I’m unsure” if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of stars from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom offer any differences in between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of – however not all – games are free

Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely touts on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, advertisements typically focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while omitting the capacity for actual gaming losses.

Others lure consumers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement revealing off Drake’s automobiles, airplanes and mansions before pivoting to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

‘Daddy, why do we have so much money?’ read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: ‘Because I never ever quit.’

The inconsistency between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they’re not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

‘Most social sweeps customers never ever make a purchase,’ the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of customers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling websites.’

Social gambling establishments provide clients a chance to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency often referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be used to unlock numerous functions within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling clients to obtain other currency understood as ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement revealing off Drake’s automobiles, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but seven states, which has assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require generally require identification. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable customers to send mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully particular instructions. What’s more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, therefore providing a reason to try their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win – or lose – real money.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a method of promoting their bread and butter.

‘Social sweepstakes video games are simply a kind of online entertainment,’ an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by email. ‘No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement – or” consideration” – is a crucial difference between social sweeps and traditional online gambling sites like casinos.’

Consider the method that McDonald’s utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to gamble, however rather they’re purchasing hamburgers and fries that use them the chance to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘factor to consider’, the game itself doesn’t meet the meaning of gambling in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all type of everyday services in the United States, everything from burgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement shops,’ the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promotions are routinely utilized by a who’s who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to lots of sports betting industry experts, that argument doesn’t cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald’s Monopoly video game doesn’t run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thus suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They do not last forever and they’re usually not tied to casino-style video games of opportunity,’ Wallach told .com. ‘They’re simply cash free gifts.

‘The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the qualities typically connected with McDonald’s-style sweepstakes promotions,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos provide” casino-like” payouts, normally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payout percentage for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is a trivial share of the earnings earned by the business [generally less than one percent]’

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that emerged in Florida, providing consumers the possibility to play casino-style video games for real prizes. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have since been shuttered over allegations of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celebrity spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should face comparable scrutiny.

‘These differences are not arbitrary,’ Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. ‘They have actually consistently been mentioned by courts and state chief law officer as key consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for illegal sports betting.’

One of the gambling establishment industry’s leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

‘Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up substantial tax and profits opportunities as this sports betting changes that conducted through regulated channels,’ read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent claim, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New york city state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an ‘illegal sports betting business. ‘

Apple and Google have likewise been called as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com’s demand for remark.

‘We generally do not discuss matters before the courts,’ a VGW representative told DailyMail.com through e-mail. ‘However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

‘We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and remain positive about the future,’ the spokesperson continued. ‘We continue to provide our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a years, developing not just great games, user experiences and home entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

‘More broadly, we ‘d repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are reasonably common throughout the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to vigorously defend any claim which might be brought against us.’

The issues between conventional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show problematic for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both endorse VGW’s Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with traditional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s ironic that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering ‘sweeps’ sites while at the exact same time the leagues want to predict a strong stance versus illegal gambling – specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,’ Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting apparently unlawful gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,’ Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers’ agents reacted to DailyMail.com’s demands for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise disregarded to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a duty to discuss to customers the distinctions and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

‘We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson said. ‘Some of our values are” our players come first” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

‘Celebrities who lend their names to shady unlawful gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at threat along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare harm,’ Glaser stated. ‘There is also some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating illegal sports betting.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton