support@eyecix.com

987654321

Overview

  • Founded Date July 17, 1973
  • Sectors Restaurant Services
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 7
Bottom Promo

Company Description

This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence company that establishes open-source big language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the business in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model provides responses equivalent to other contemporary big language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to limit the capability of these two countries to establish sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share rate to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against bigger and more recognized rivals has actually been explained as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the first chance at what is becoming an international AI area race”, [11] and introducing “a new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative artificial intelligence algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be freely readily available for use, adjustment, watching, and creating files for building purposes. [13] The company reportedly intensely hires young AI scientists from top Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer technology field to diversify its designs’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading considering that the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, implying its code is easily readily available for use, modification, and viewing. This includes approval to gain access to and use the source code, in addition to design documents, for . [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip limitations on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial general intelligence lab dedicated to research developing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were hesitant in offering funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to create an exit in a short amount of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being referred to as the catalyst for China’s AI model price war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the rate of their AI models to compete with the company. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research study and has no in-depth prepare for commercialization; [20] this likewise permits its technology to avoid the most rigid provisions of China’s AI guidelines, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to comply with the government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical abilities instead of work experience, resulting in many new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the business hires individuals without any computer technology background to assist its innovation understand other subjects and understanding locations, consisting of having the ability to produce poetry and carry out well on the infamously difficult Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available free of charge to both scientists and commercial users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license contract (“DeepSeek license”) relating to “open and accountable downstream use” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline information. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was established to compete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes higher than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the exact same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the two Base designs was also released concurrently, gotten by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared similar efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They found this to assist with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some experts can end up being excessively depended on, while other professionals might be hardly ever utilized, squandering parameters. Attempting to balance the professionals so that they are similarly used then triggers experts to duplicate the exact same capability. They proposed the shared experts to discover core capacities that are often used, and let the routed experts to discover the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever used. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The reward model was a process benefit model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This reward model was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was constantly updated during training to avoid benefit hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two larger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL using GRPO in 2 phases. The first stage was trained to solve math and coding problems. This stage used 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second phase was trained to be practical, safe, and follow rules. This stage utilized 3 reward models. The helpfulness and security reward designs were trained on human choice data. The rule-based benefit model was by hand configured. All experienced benefit designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They went with 2-staged RL, since they discovered that RL on thinking data had “special attributes” different from RL on general data. For instance, RL on thinking might improve over more training actions. [31]

The two V2-Lite designs were smaller sized, and trained likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were substantially customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mix of specialists (MoE) variant formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then combined with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math problems was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was created by a benefit model trained to forecast whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of mathematics and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programs, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) information. Reasoning information was generated by “skilled models”. Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by people. – The “professional designs” were trained by beginning with an undefined base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial information produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and confirm during thinking. Then the specialist models were RL using an undefined reward function.
– Each expert model was trained to generate just synthetic thinking data in one particular domain (math, programs, reasoning).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor format, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based benefit designs were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data containing both final benefit and chain-of-thought causing the last reward. The reward design produced benefit signals for both concerns with objective but free-form answers, and concerns without unbiased answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was computed for mathematics issues with a final answer (put in a box), and for shows issues by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed substantial low-level engineering to attain performance. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, needing special GEMM regimens to collect precisely. They used a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the interaction latency by overlapping extensively computation and communication, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They decreased communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact maker each expert was on in order to avoid certain machines being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 outperformed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available through DeepSeek’s API, along with via a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for rational reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek declared that it surpassed performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal stated when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business also launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information generated by R1. [47]

A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant first thinks about the reasoning procedure in the mind and then offers the user with the answer. The thinking process and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they used no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “mainly” of 2 types (other types were not defined): accuracy rewards and format rewards. Accuracy benefit was examining whether a boxed answer is appropriate (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format reward was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to resolve these concerns and more improve thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning information from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the created reasoning had an incorrect final response, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly answers concerns, resolves logic problems and writes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as many as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require just about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta spent building its latest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive performance at reasonably very little expense has been acknowledged as possibly challenging the worldwide supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 model was apparently “on par with” among OpenAI’s latest models when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen also explained R1 as “AI‘s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly applauded DeepSeek as a national asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with specialists and asked him to offer viewpoints and tips on a draft for comments of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has actually highlighted possible limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which consist of export limitations on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models consequently “triggered market chaos” [57] and caused shares in significant international innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies likewise sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 design, had caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are involved in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “super impressive”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed skepticism of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to contact number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack disrupted the correct functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the main application programs user interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers found in China, utilizes censorship systems for subjects that are thought about politically sensitive for the federal government of China. For instance, the model refuses to respond to concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might initially generate a response, however then deletes it shortly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship systems and restrictions can only be removed to a minimal degree in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We firmly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are dedicated to achieving the total reunification of the motherland through peaceful methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to trick DeepSeek into giving certain answers to a few of these subjects by asking for in its answer to switch specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some experts fear that the federal government of China could utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading disinformation, monitoring and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms say “We keep the info we gather in secure servers located in individuals’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you provide to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security issues. [80] In action, the Italian information defense authority is seeking extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of individual information, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually started a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned making use of DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s usage of personal info. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed picking “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI model DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s more affordable designs and weaker chips call into question trillions in AI infrastructure costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to drop?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI design conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design exceeds Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI design seems among the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI design breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “super remarkable”: “We ought to take the advancements out of China really, very seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends enormous Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly restricted brand-new sign-ups, pointing out ‘massive destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We attempted out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI postures formidable cyber, data personal privacy threats”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses impact of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.

Bottom Promo
Bottom Promo
Top Promo